Virus ancestry could help predict next pandemic

The research shows that viruses from other genetic backgrounds are less likely to cause a high number of infections in humans. These findings will support ongoing efforts to monitor and prepare for future pandemics, including guiding vaccine and diagnostic development. 

This work was published in Molecular Biology and Evolution in an article entitled 'Temporal Dynamics, Discovery, and Emergence of Human-Transmissible RNA Viruses',  with authors from both the Usher and Roslin Institutes.

Virus evolution

RNA viruses carry their genetic information as RNA, rather than DNA. They cause many diseases, including the common cold, Covid-19 and measles, and have been responsible for most epidemics, or global pandemics, in recent history.

Monitoring RNA viruses in animal populations could help to identify those that are most likely to emerge and spread rapidly in humans. However, the huge number in circulation makes this extremely challenging and expensive.

The University of Edinburgh-led research team traced the lineage, or family tree, of 743 distinct RNA virus species to track how they evolved, including all species currently known to infect humans.

Researchers compared the development of strictly zoonotic viruses – those that spread from animals to humans, but not between people – with human-transmissible viruses, which can spread within human populations.

Human transmission

The findings showed that viruses that can spread within human populations typically evolve separately from strictly zoonotic viruses.

Human-transmissible viruses often emerge when related viruses from the same lineage can already spread between humans.

Strictly zoonotic viruses have historically not led to epidemics in human populations. Having a close relative that can infect humans, but not spread between them, does not appear to increase the risk of epidemic potential.

Streamline surveillance

The research team caution that there is still a chance the next pandemic could come as the result of a strictly zoonotic virus – such as bird flu – or an entirely new virus. However, the findings offer a route to help streamline surveillance for Disease X (a hypothetical, unidentified pathogen that could pose a significant threat to people) among the vast number of RNA viruses in existence.